I've seen someone say that this is like "Avengers: Endgame", and I can kind of see it. But not in a way that you would expect, probably.
To be honest, I think I would rather read this as a book, because the story may work better that way. It reminded me of quite a few adaptations of Stephen King's books, which often suffered from the same "issues", that actually made me like his books. Sinners in particular can remind you of Salem's Lot. Both start with seemingly mundane things, starting separate storylines, and then at some point the narrative "breaks" into supernatural, completely changing gears.
How is this relevant to Endgame? Quite simply: Endgame was that "breaking point", when multiple storylines converged into. That's it. No other relationship or similarities. And the sadder thing is: this used to be normal narrative device in good movies and TV shows, but I can't remember the last movie that was able to properly use it (Nosferatu, perhaps?), and from recent TV shows... Maybe Interview With The Vampire? Although those storylines were interconnected to begin with. But that's, of course, not this movie's problem, because it has some other ones.
The way it builds the settings in the first third of the runtime is really good. There is nothing particularly memorable, but it is "compelling", it is "believable". That's why it reminds me of Stephen King, because quite a few of his books start in similar way, including Salem's Lot. But unlike Lot, Sinners expose vampires too soon. And the breaking point comes too soon. Lot took days (from story's perspective) before there was any glimpse of supernatural, and only suggested, that something may be off, and that made the story itself... Well, more impactful, I guess. And more balanced, when it switched to vampire hunting.
Sinners, on the other hand, changes pacing too soon, and yet not soon enough. Before the all characters assemble in that house, which will become resting place for a lot of them, it looked like only 1 day has passed, and that time was passing relatively slow. Then the night in that house was passing slightly faster, and then things escalated pretty quickly, but they moved fast only for the last quarter of the movie or so, which makes it feel unbalanced.
I think if this was a series (or a book, as I mentioned in the beginning) it could have played more with hints of supernatural through-out the first 4 episodes, finally revealing vampires in the 5th episode and finishing the show on 6th episode - it would be more balanced. Or if it was relatively fast from the start, time-skipping a little bit, and still dropping hints, that there are predators out there. Or even drop the vampires in within the last 10-15 minutes of the movie (similar to how I do this in my He, She, It).
As is... It's not a bad movie, that's for sure. I would say it's of a good quality overall. But I don't think it has enough impact, because I did not really feel anything for the characters (yet), and it was not brutal or funny enough to be similar to "From Dusk Till Dawn" (which a lot of people seem to be comparing it to). It just could have been... More. Especially since atmosphere, music, visuals, actors, and whatnot - everything on its own is quite good and pleasing.
Can I recommend this movie? In general - yes. If you watch this, I expect that you will not feel like you've wasted your time. I will probably give it 7.5/10, and it's a solid 7.5.
